
Stronghold (SHX) is a payments token issued on the Stellar network. The asset was created on Stellar on 22 December 2018, and separate SHX contracts also exist on Ethereum and Solana. SHX is built to pay for and coordinate settlement across a payments rail rather than to secure a chain of its own.
Stronghold at a Glance
|
Metric
|
Details
|
|
Token name
|
Stronghold
|
|
Ticker
|
SHX
|
|
Home blockchain
|
Stellar, asset created 22 December 2018
|
|
Other deployments
|
Two live Ethereum ERC-20 contracts, at least one plausible Solana mint, plus an announced XRP Ledger deployment the desk could not confirm
|
|
Live Ethereum contract
|
0x516d31...9787, a 45-byte EIP-1167 proxy pointing at implementation 0x7f9f70da...
|
|
Inactive Ethereum contract
|
0xee7527...7084, 4,096 bytes, name "Stronghold SHx", $2 of 24-hour volume
|
|
Supply
|
Disputed. Stellar chain issuance 99,747,757,785. CoinGecko circulating 18.38 billion. CoinPaprika implied circulating about 5.80 billion
|
|
Where the supply sits
|
64,137,911,804 SHX, or 64.3% of issuance, inside Soroban contracts. 35.48 billion in classic Stellar accounts
|
|
Trustlines
|
91,533
|
|
Last complete daily close
|
$0.0038602752, Saturday 5 September 2026, CoinGecko
|
|
Market cap at that close
|
$70,945,384 CoinGecko against $22,395,754 CoinPaprika, a 3.17x gap
|
|
24-hour volume at that close
|
$1,002,898, up 3.60x over seven sessions from $278,269
|
|
Core narrative
|
Payments and settlement on Stellar
|
|
Token type
|
Stellar-issued asset with bridged ERC-20 representations
|
|
Primary risks
|
Three incompatible supply figures, a dense same-ticker decoy field, a thin book
|
|
Available on Phemex
|
No. SHX has no Phemex spot pair and no Phemex futures pair
|
Two feeds priced SHX within 0.124% of each other at the Saturday 5 September 2026 close. The same two feeds disagreed about how big the asset is by 3.17x. CoinGecko carried a market cap of $70,945,384 against 18.38 billion circulating tokens, CoinPaprika carried $22,395,754 against roughly 5.80 billion, and the Stellar network itself has issued 99,747,757,785 SHX.
Think of it as a shipping manifest. Ninety-nine billion crates left the port, the receiving office logged eighteen billion, and the insurer wrote down six billion. Everyone agrees on what one crate costs. Nobody agrees on how many crates there are, so the price is the least useful number on the page.
Before you look at a chart, you need to know which SHX you're looking at. There are more candidates than you'd guess.
What Is Stronghold (SHX)?
Stronghold is a payments business and SHX is the token attached to it. The asset lives natively on Stellar, a settlement network designed for moving value between currencies rather than for running general-purpose applications. That design choice explains most of what SHX is and most of what it isn't.
On Stellar you don't hold an asset by default. Your account has to open a trustline first, an explicit opt-in saying you're willing to hold units of a specific asset from a specific issuer. SHX has 91,533 trustlines. That figure isn't a holder count and it isn't a user count, but it is a real ceiling on how many Stellar accounts have ever agreed to touch the asset at all.
The issuer has also set the auth_immutable flag. In plain terms, the issuing account has permanently given up the ability to change its authorization settings. It can't later switch on the power to freeze or claw back balances from holders. For a payments token that's a meaningful commitment, and it's the kind of thing you should check yourself rather than take from a marketing page.
Of the 99,747,757,785 SHX the chain shows as issued, 64,137,911,804 tokens, or 64.3%, sit inside Soroban contracts, Stellar's smart contract environment. Another 35.48 billion is held in classic Stellar accounts. Those two buckets don't quite add up to total issuance, so a small residual lives outside both. If you're modelling float, that 64.3% is the number that matters most and the one almost no price page shows you.
Why Did SHX Become Popular?
Volume did the talking. SHX traded $278,269 in a day seven sessions before the anchor and $1,002,898 on Saturday 5 September 2026, a 3.60x increase. The token closed that session +9.32% and finished the seven-session window +14.29%.
And now the counterweight, because a rising token in a rising market proves less than it looks like it proves. Saturday 5 September was a broad altcoin session. Nineteen of the twenty-one assets on the desk's tape rose that day while bitcoin managed only +0.21%. SHX outperformed BTC comfortably, and so did most things with a ticker.
The ratio is more interesting than the move. Daily volume divided by market cap came to 0.0141, meaning SHX turned over about 1.4% of its own headline capitalisation in a session. A token trading many times its market cap every day is usually being churned. A token at 1.4% has the opposite problem. This is a thin, slow book, and thin books move hard in both directions on modest flow.
How Does the SHX Token Work?
Here the article stops being an explainer and becomes an audit. SHX exists in at least four places the desk could reach, and the numbers those places report cannot be reconciled with each other.
|
Source
|
Supply reported
|
What it implies
|
|
Stellar chain issuance
|
99,747,757,785
|
About $385.1 million at the 5 September close
|
|
CoinGecko circulating
|
18.38 billion
|
$70,945,384 market cap
|
|
CoinPaprika implied circulating
|
About 5.80 billion
|
$22,395,754 market cap
|
|
Live Ethereum contract totalSupply
|
3.83 billion
|
A bridged representation, not the whole asset
|
|
Inactive Ethereum contract totalSupply
|
Exactly 100,000,000,000
|
A dead deployment doing $2 of daily volume
|
The two Ethereum contracts are the part that will catch a careful reader out. **0x516d31...9787 is only 45 bytes of code.**That's an EIP-1167 minimal proxy, a standard pattern holding no logic of its own and forwarding every call to an implementation contract, here 0x7f9f70da... A 45-byte contract works like a forwarding address rather than a building. Its symbol reads SHX, its supply reads 3.83 billion, and it holds the real market at $1.24 million of liquidity and $127,511 of 24-hour volume.
The other one, 0xee7527...7084, runs to 4,096 bytes, carries the name "Stronghold SHx" and a total supply of exactly 100,000,000,000, and did $2 of volume in a day. It's the older deployment and it's finished.
The two are joined by a $1,335,752 SHX/SHX migration pool, which is what a swap between an old contract and a new one looks like on a decentralised exchange.
And here is the trap that matters most. CoinGecko's human-facing explorer link points at the dead contract while its own machine-readable platform field points at the live one. Click the button on the page and you land on the deployment doing $2 a day. Pull the same page through an API and you get the one doing $127,511. Same data provider, same asset, two different answers depending on which door you walk through.
Stronghold vs Bitcoin
This comparison isn't about which asset is the better buy. It's about what a single canonical answer is worth, and bitcoin is the cleanest example of one.
|
Category
|
Stronghold (SHX)
|
Bitcoin (BTC)
|
|
Main identity
|
Payments token issued on another network
|
Native asset of its own network
|
|
Blockchain
|
Stellar, with ERC-20 representations on Ethereum and mints on Solana
|
Bitcoin only
|
|
Core value driver
|
Settlement and payments usage
|
Monetary demand and network security
|
|
Supply model
|
Contested. Three published figures spanning 5.80 billion to 99.75 billion
|
One published figure, verifiable by anyone running a node
|
|
Last complete daily close
|
$0.0038602752, Saturday 5 September 2026
|
$79,836.11, Saturday 5 September 2026
|
|
Market maturity
|
Thin book at $1,002,898 of daily volume
|
Deep global market across every major venue
|
|
Risk profile
|
Identity risk before price risk
|
Price risk, with identity settled
|
|
Phemex availability
|
No pair
|
Futures pair available
|
Read that table as a checklist rather than a verdict. With bitcoin your first question can be about price. With SHX your first question has to be about which asset you are pricing.
What Can Move the SHX Price?
A supply reconciliation between feeds
If either feed corrects toward the other, the published market cap changes by up to 3.17x without a single trade taking place. Screeners, ranking sites and portfolio trackers all read those feeds. A number moving on a spreadsheet can shift sentiment faster than flow does.
Real payment volume on Stellar
SHX is pitched at settlement, so the fair metric is transaction activity rather than speculation. Stellar's ledger is public and you can check it yourself, and that is more than most tokens offer you.
The Ethereum migration pool draining
That $1,335,752 SHX/SHX pool exists to move holders from the old contract to the new one. When a migration pool empties, the float on the live contract changes, and 3.83 billion tokens is a small enough base for the change to be visible.
Soroban contract activity
With 64.3% of issuance held inside contracts, anything releasing or re-locking that balance matters more than the daily tape. This is the closest thing SHX has to a vesting unlock schedule, and it's the number to track. Supply moving from locked to liquid has a well-documented effect on price, and our guide to token inflation walks through the mechanics.
Broad altcoin sessions
SHX rose 9.32% on a day when nineteen of twenty-one tracked assets rose. Correlation to the wider altcoin bid is a driver, and it's the one that reverses fastest.
Risks of Buying or Trading Stronghold
Three supply figures that cannot all be right
This is not a rounding difference. It is two published market caps built on two different token counts, sitting under a chain reporting a third. Until you know which count you accept, you don't know what you'd be buying at any price.
A same-ticker decoy field on Solana
At least five separate Solana addresses use the SHX ticker. Between them they claim $374 million to $1.31 billion of liquidity against $40 to $47 of daily volume. Only one, an address beginning EFchnNkBvh4gSY5zqDgq, looks real at $101,819 of liquidity and $4,283 of volume. The decoys are obvious to a reader who checks volume and invisible to one who doesn't. It's the same failure mode that makes rug pulls work.
The wrong explorer link on the right data page
A reputable aggregator pointed its clickable link at a dead contract. You can do everything right, start from a trusted source, click the obvious button and still land on the wrong asset.
Null mint and freeze authority proves nothing
On Solana, a revoked mint authority and a revoked freeze authority are often presented as a safety badge. They are not identification. Any impersonator can revoke both on a fake mint in a single transaction. Those flags rule out one specific attack. They say nothing about who issued the token or what the ticker refers to.
A thin book cuts both ways
At 1.4% turnover against market cap, a position of any size moves the price against you on the way in and again on the way out. Understanding how liquidity pools set that cost is the difference between a planned entry and an accidental one.
No Phemex pair and no venue guarantee
SHX doesn't trade on Phemex in spot or in futures. Where it does trade, it trades across a mix of decentralised pools and smaller centralised venues, and the deepest pool the desk found held $1.24 million. That is the whole cushion.
How Do You Research Stronghold Safely?
This is the section to keep. Every step below is a check you can run in a browser, and the order matters.
Sort by volume and holders, never by liquidity. Sorting a token screener by liquidity is like a restaurant guide that ranks every place by how many chairs it owns instead of how many people are eating. The Solana decoy set claims over a billion dollars of liquidity and does forty dollars of business a day. Volume is what someone paid real money to move. Liquidity is what a pool claims to hold, and a claim is cheap.
Treat null mint and freeze authority as necessary, not sufficient. Check them, then keep going, because they eliminate one specific attack and identify nothing at all about who issued the token you are holding.
Read the machine-readable field, not the clickable button. On SHX those two disagreed on a major aggregator. Where an API field and a link on the same page point at different contracts, the API field is usually the maintained one and the link is usually the stale one. Verify both against the chain.
Compare two feeds before trusting any number, and know the offset. CoinGecko's dated history endpoint returns the previous day's close, so a naive comparison against another feed produces a fake spread. Correct both feeds or neither. On SHX the corrected price spread came to 0.124%, which told the desk the price was fine and sent it looking at supply instead.
Check the issuing account, never the asset code alone. On Stellar an asset is defined by its code plus its issuing account. Two assets can both call themselves SHX and be entirely unrelated. The issuing account is the identity.
Check pool age and pool depth together. A pool created days ago, holding a headline liquidity figure and doing almost no volume, is the standard impersonation signature. So is a pool whose liquidity number cannot be moved by any trade you can find on the chart.
Expand every abbreviated address. The addresses in this article are shortened for readability, and shortened addresses are exactly what impersonators exploit. Two contracts sharing a prefix and a suffix are trivial to produce. Paste the full string, character for character, every time.
Is Stronghold a Good Investment?
No prediction here, and there won't be one. What the data supports is narrower and more useful than a target price.
SHX is a real asset with a real chain of custody. It was created on Stellar on 22 December 2018, its issuer locked its authorization flags, it carries 91,533 trustlines, and its live Ethereum pool holds $1.24 million against $127,511 of daily turnover. Those are not the fingerprints of a fake.
What SHX also carries is an identity problem the market hasn't resolved. Two feeds publish market caps 3.17x apart. Nearly two thirds of chain issuance is locked inside contracts. A leading data page links to a dead deployment. Five Solana addresses carry the ticker. Every one of those is a reason for a discount, and none of them has anything to do with the payments business the token is meant to serve.
So the real question isn't about upside. It's about how much identity risk you're taking on before you've taken any price risk at all. If you can't say which of the three supply figures you believe, you can't size the position, and an unsizeable position isn't an investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is SHX available on Phemex?
No. SHX has no Phemex spot pair and no Phemex futures pair. Leveraged exposure has to come from an asset that is actually listed, and there are more than a hundred futures contracts available across the majors and mid-caps.
How many SHX tokens exist?
The Stellar network shows 99,747,757,785 SHX issued. CoinGecko builds its market cap from 18.38 billion circulating and CoinPaprika from roughly 5.80 billion. The gap comes from how each feed decides what counts as circulating, and the 64.3% of issuance held inside Soroban contracts is the most likely reason a large portion gets excluded.
Is Stronghold live on the XRP Ledger?
Stronghold announced XRPL as a fourth network on 21 July 2026 and no issuer address was published. The desk could not confirm the deployment from any primary source, so treat it as an announcement rather than a fact. For background on what an XRPL issuance would involve, start with XRP and the XRP Ledger.
Which Ethereum contract is the real one?
0x516d31...9787 is the live one. It's a 45-byte EIP-1167 proxy to implementation 0x7f9f70da..., and it holds $1.24 million of liquidity against $127,511 of 24-hour volume. The 4,096-byte contract at 0xee7527...7084 did $2 of volume on the same day. Expand and verify both addresses in full before sending anything anywhere.
Does SHX work like a stablecoin?
No. SHX floats, and it closed Saturday 5 September 2026 at $0.0038602752. Stellar does host fiat-backed tokens issued by anchors, and if that mechanism is what you're after, our explainer on stablecoins covers how peg maintenance and reserves work. A payments-network token and a payment stablecoin are different instruments with different risks, a distinction the Open USD launch made very visible.
Final Thoughts
SHX is the clearest case the desk has documented of a token where the identity question comes before the price question. The feeds agree on price to 0.124% and disagree on the size of the asset by 3.17x, and no amount of chart reading resolves that. Five deployments carry the ticker across Stellar, Ethereum and Solana, one announced XRPL network can't be confirmed, and the aggregator most people start from links to the dead contract.
The practical takeaway is a habit rather than a trade. Sort by volume and holders, expand every address, compare two feeds with the offset corrected, and treat revoked mint and freeze authority as a box ticked rather than a question answered. Do that on SHX and you'll find the live pool in about four minutes. Skip it and you'll find a Solana address claiming a billion dollars of liquidity and doing forty dollars of business a day.
A token with three supply numbers isn't unresearchable. It's a token where the research has to happen before the chart, not after it.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency trading involves substantial risk. Always conduct your own research before making trading decisions.






