Michael Saylor and Adam Back have voiced strong opposition to BIP 110, a proposal that has sparked debate within the Bitcoin community. Adam Back, co-founder of Blockstream, expressed understanding for those concerned about spam transactions but argued that BIP 110 undermines Bitcoin's core principles of decentralization, security, and neutrality. He described the proposal as akin to "trying to spy on others." Michael Saylor echoed these sentiments, emphasizing that BIP 110 poses a greater threat by turning the spam issue into a consensus change that could invalidate legitimate transactions. Saylor urged the community to focus on more significant threats to Bitcoin. David Bailey, chairman of Bitcoin Magazine, also commented on the controversy, suggesting that the failure of BIP 110 is a positive outcome, reinforcing Bitcoin's resilience against attacks and divisions.