A recent discussion has emerged around the balance between voting rights and the humanitarian benefits of mass migration. The argument suggests that while equal voting rights are important, the ethical and economic advantages of open or low borders could justify a more flexible approach to political participation. This perspective highlights the potential for significant improvements in living standards for migrants, with salaries potentially increasing from $2,000 to $8,000 per year, offering transformative benefits for families. The debate also considers the responsibility towards individuals in politically unstable countries, presenting four options: allowing migration, providing resources, improving local institutions, or giving up. Critics argue that improving institutions often faces resistance from entrenched elites, while migration offers a viable solution without draining source countries of opportunity. Evidence suggests that migrants contribute positively by sending remittances and returning with new ideas, fostering political and social advancements in their home countries.