Blockstream CEO Adam Back has dismissed allegations of censorship related to the BIP-110 proposal, which aims to limit arbitrary data in Bitcoin transactions. The controversy reignited on X after GrassFedBitcoin claimed that critics of BIP-110 were being silenced on platforms like bitcointalk and Reddit. Back refuted these claims, stating that the proposal is being ignored due to its lack of merit, not because of any coordinated suppression. BIP-110 seeks to restrict large data fields in transactions, targeting uses like inscriptions and Ordinals. Proponents argue it preserves Bitcoin's monetary focus, while opponents warn it could undermine neutrality and split the network. Currently, the proposal lacks significant support from nodes and mining pools, making its activation unlikely without a shift in consensus.